(The Good, The Bad,....The Sick)

*

It is important to appreciate that feminism has had many faces; good, bad and the sick....We should not accept any movement based on merely its strengths, but also address its weaknesses. There is no doubt that issues were brought forward to the conscious of North America that negatively affected "Women" and resulted in some positive changes.We should not ignore that during this century "some women, some men and some families" experienced oppression from a variety of sources and for a variety of reasons, including self oppression and mutual oppression. The response by radical negative feminism was unbalanced, unfair, unjustified, bigoted and sexist and paradoxically further oppressive.

The movement, or at least one of the most active factions focused on the negative and certain elements within the movement took over. The battle of the sexes was exactly that; , male verses female. The manipulation, the negative manipulation attests to that. The use of generalizations, and illogical "half-truth" thought arguments, attests to the manipulation.

If you have not read the first few pages of this web site, let me explain that a half-truth is -a truth that is a lie -, because it is part of the greater truth; a newly discovered paradox. I explain this because the current definition of "half-truth" is incorrect. Tragically the isolation of issues affecting "some" women ignored that these same issues affected "some" men and "some" children. The polarization of the sexes was achieved by the use of deceptive "half-truths" by some groups whose anti-male agenda became very obvious; tragically the entire society suffered, including again some women.

While there has been some positive advancements attributable to the feminist movement, we cannot or should not ignore the devastating negative effects of certain portions of this movement who have been radically and militantly motivated. Some of the movement was based on "poor" and "inappropriate" conclusions; such as the discrepancy between male and female salaries, (which ignored shared family incomes), or other statistical and logical manipulations. A deceptive attack on the roles of fatherhood and motherhood, was effective. The involvement of social psychopaths-the bad, and the "sick feminists", went undetected. Perhaps blaming this all on "the devil' would be the best strategy.

It is hoped that a more critical assessment of all individuals within our society be undertaken to ensure that only individuals with a positive perspective be given positions of importance. It is also hoped that these individuals reflect the values and ideals of general society. As far as feminism goes we should at least differentiate between those who are "moral" and "immoral," and at least those who are perhaps "sick." The proliferation of a variety of individuals with questionable personality disorders is understandable.

It is interesting to note that some individuals with questionable backgrounds were allowed to represent "women' in general. Some of the initial leaders of the movement, were born into families with mental illness, and dysfunctionality, a reality that was taught to the rest of society as being the norm. "Black and White" thinking, a characteristic of these illnesses were manipulated onto the unsuspecting mainstream society. What actually happened was that illogical thought patterns were programed into the general society. Most of this based on the powerful deceptive "half-truth," which till today is not properly understood.

Paradoxically many of the social programs of the time, focused on the negative and resulted in further victimization of a great many families, men, fathers and husbands, women, mothers and wives, children, and society in general. We have problems but we are not being critical by any measure to address the causes and promote the positive; we have been deceived.

My greatest objection is to non-moral-heterosexual feminists, who did and are manipulating themselves into the heterosexual agenda. They are disguised as "social caring" individuals, and their reality would suggest that they are not telling the truth about who and what they are all about. The involvement of these individuals, manipulating an anti-male, anti-father agenda and discussing male/female relationships, especially in women's centers, appears a conflict of interest, and should be investigated. This category of "predatory" social worker applies to all groups including heterosexuals as well. Social agencies dealing with "women" have allowed social predators, be they men or women to prey on vulnerable minds and bodies. To isolate one group would again be half-truth based logic; there are "bad apples" in every group, let us not paint all within that group with the same "color brush."

IT IS IMPORTANT TO APPRECIATE THE "DECEPTIVE WOLVES" IN SHEEPS CLOTHING "CULT-LESBIANS" (not all lesbians) WHO ARE MANIPULATING SOCIAL PROGRAMS DIRECTED AT "WOMEN" TO ATTACK AND POLARIZE THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY UNIT. THE SEXIST ATTACK OF MEN, MALE VERSES FEMALE ARGUMENTS, WHICH DIRECTLY ATTACK MEN AND FATHERS, BUT ALSO ATTACK WIVES, MOTHERS AND PARENTS, AS THE FAMILY IS POLARIZED. THE POLARIZATION OF THE SEXES IS A DIRECT BENEFIT TO THE GAY AND CULT-LESBIAN COMMUNITY........ (June 16, 1998)

Perhaps the greatest flaw, the cancer, is reflected in its lack of PROMOTING the positive.

(saying Adolph Hitler was evil..does THAT make you anti-male?)